The internet has definitely turned many ordinary people today in addicts, news junkies that is. And believe me, there are many ways to get your daily news fix; Yahoo News, Google News, MSN, CNN, blogs, and many more. News news news .... we get buried in information and news. Over the last year or so, I've sort of narrowed down to using only a few sources of information for my daily news fix. These are Yahoo News, del.icio.us, findory and now Digg. I use these sites as mechanisms to discover breaking news and trends. They perform this task faily well, and as a result, many people check such sites nearly every day. (Reference: Delicious, Digg and the new balance of power).
Admittedly, most of the users of Digg are more of the "technie" kind. More than half its news are technology or science in nature. Digg has a real-time view of all the activities that happen in the site, including new story submission, Digging status, etc. Now who would want that except geeks and techies? (Reference: spying on Digg).
Now, let's take a look at the social framework or community that makes Digg work. Afterall, news in Digg are submitted by its community, voted and commented by its community, and even buried by its community, i.e. news by the people and for the people. Alex Bosworth's blog gives a very good description of the dynamics of this community. According to Alex, there are several groups of people that make up this community. What's really interesting about these groups is that each of them is required for the system to function, they all came together relatively quickly, and each of them have different and complementary rewards for what they do. In general, this is both good and bad. The bad part is that the news are shaped by the behaviour of the community. (Reference: the Wisdom of browse).
Lately I've observed that people who submit links as news to be "Dugg" by the community are becoming very competitive. They scour the internet for hot and news worthy links and rush to be the first to submit those. I have read many angry comments by people who fight with one another over who submitted links first, very much like children who say "I saw it first !!!". In Digg, there is a feature to bury stories by reporting them as problems, duplicates or inaccurate. I have also seen people who use this as a weapon against others by deliberately burying their rival's stories. There are also people who are so prolific as story submitters that they submit a story every few minutes, 7 days a week ! These become celebrities with huge following.
So if you are new to Digg and have suddenly been caught up with the excitement of submitting and Digging stories, do be prepared to get flamed once in a while. Some comments can be real nasty as well.
In conclusion, Digg is good for those of us who are news junkies and need our daily technology or science news fix. You do not get many business and finance type of news here. Forget about health, sports, entertainment or other kinds of news here. All-in-all, Digg is good. I also kinda like the fact that it saves under your profile all those stories that you Dugg, sort of like bookmarks. The only problem is that they do not have good search or tagging mechanisms for you to manage your bookmarks, especially if you have many of them. That is why I balance my diet for news by using del.icio.us, findory and Yahoo News (more about these later).
Have a nice new-sy day !
No comments:
Post a Comment